Stupid Girls

Monday, April 26, 2004

Alter Net women

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

PRO-CHOICE MARCH LARGEST IN HISTORY
Allison Stevens, Women's eNews
More than a million demonstrators turned out for Sunday's
March for Women's Lives, making it a historic day for
reproductive rights.
here

THE BLACK WOMAN ON CHANNEL TWO
Mark Reynolds, PopMatters
Progress be damned, African Americans still identify deeply
with celebrities on their television screen, be it Janet
Jackson or Condoleezza Rice.
*In MediaCulture: here

March for Women's Lives

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

TODAY'S SHOW: Monday, April 26
* March For Women's Lives: Up to a Million Descend on DC in One of the Largest Protests in U.S. History *
Up to one million protesters descended on Washington DC Sunday to show support for reproductive rights and opposition to Bush administration policies on women's health issues in what could be the biggest demonstration in U.S. history. We hear speeches from celebrities and activists addressing the crowd.
Listen/Watch/Read
here

* Howard Dean on Women's Rights, Elections, Iraq and Israel's Assassination Policy *
Former Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean, speaks with Democracy Now! before addressing the crowd at the March For Women's Lives in Washington DC. He says the U.S. should hand over control of Iraq to the United Nations, discusses the presidential election and says he supports Israel's assassination of Hamas leaders.
Listen/Watch/Read
here

* Headlines for April 26, 2004 *
- Suicide Boat Bombers Attack Iraq Oil Terminals
- Chalabi May Be Ousted From Power
- Saudis Secretly Helped US Iraq Invasion
- Poll Shows U.S. Public Uninformed of Iraq Issues
- Report: 1.6M Ballots Not Registered in 2000 Election
- U.S. Attempts to Gag FBI Translator Sibel Edmonds
Listen/Watch/Read
here

Daily Chimp women

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

Steve Gilliard: 'Why abortion rights matter' link:here

Tens of thousands march in Washington: Abortion-rights rally takes aim at Bush link:here

Friday, April 23, 2004

Alter Net women

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

DO PREGNANT WOMEN HAVE RIGHTS?
Lynn M. Paltrow, AlterNet
New laws deny women the right to bodily integrity and
physical liberty while their fetuses are granted more
rights than any legal person under law.
here

THE CHICK LIT CHALLENGE
Anjula Razdan, Utne Reader
Do trendy novels for young women smother female expression
-- or just put a little fun in feminism?
here

Tuesday, April 20, 2004

Mothers In Prison

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

Arkansas Educational Television Network (AETN) presents
"Mothers in Prison"
Women are now the fastest growing segment of the prison population. Eighty percent of women in prison are mothers. AETN presents a look at the social, economic, political and emotional costs of incarcerating mothers.
here

NOVA: World In Balance

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

NOVA
"World in the Balance"
Tuesday, April 20, 2004
8 - 10:00 pm
On Earth Day join "NOVA" for an up-to-date global snapshot of today's human family, now numbering 6.3 billion and likely to increase to nearly 9 billion by 2050. (CC, Stereo, DVI)
Test your understanding of the population trends and environmental challenges facing nations around the world in our online "Global Trends Quiz." Plus, log onto washingtonpost.com/liveonline on April 21 at 2 pm ET to discuss the program with Geeta Rao Gupta, Ph.D., President, International Center for Research on Women.
here

POV: Love & Diane

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

Coming Up: Love & Diane Airs April 21, 2004

"Love & Diane" is a frank and astonishingly intimate real-life drama of a mother and daughter desperate for love and forgiveness, but caught in a devastating cycle.

During the 1980s, a crack cocaine epidemic ravaged and impoverished many inner city neighborhoods. As parents like Diane succumbed to addiction, a generation of children like Love entered the foster care system. Shot over ten years, the film centers on Love and Diane after the family is reunited and is struggling to reconnect.

Check local listings:
here

Tuesday, April 06, 2004

Unknown News women

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

===
Morissette mocks U.S. censorship
here

===
Profound disrespect for women
Editorial, The New York Times
# with comments by Barbara
here

===

Monday, April 05, 2004

Alter Net women

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

THE PREGNANCY�POLICE
Lynn M. Paltrow, Tompaine.com
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act poses the greatest
danger not to women seeking abortions, but to pregnant
women who want to have their babies.
here

THE CRIMES OF COURTNEY LOVE
Richard Goldstein, Village Voice
The rock star's latest antics may be a publicity stunt, but
female exhibitionism is also an act of female power.
*In MediaCulture: here

TWISTED SISTERS
Margaret Sullivan, Washington Monthly
Scratch at the surface of the pearl-draped image of college
sororities, and a far different picture emerges, one of a
disturbing subculture ruled by out-of-control peer pressure
and the lust for prestige.
here

Thursday, April 01, 2004

Christian Taliban

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

The Christian Taliban
Stephen Pizzo, AlterNet
March 28, 2004

During the Taliban rule of Afghanistan the world got a good look at what happens when religious zealots gain control of a government. Television images of women being beaten, forced to wear burkas, and banned from schools and the workplace helped build strong public support for the President's decision to invade Afghanistan in the wake of 9/11.

But even as President George W. Bush denounced the brutal Islamic fundamentalist regime in Kabul, he was quietly laying the foundations for his own fundamentalist regime at home. For the first time far right Christian fundamentalists had one of their own in the White House and the opportunity to begin rolling back decades of health and family planning programs they saw as un-Christian, if not downright sinful.

Since 2001 dozens of far-right Christian fundamentalists have been quietly installed in key positions within the Department of Health and Human Services, the Federal Drug Administration and on commissions and advisory committees where they have made serious progress. Three years later this administration has established one of the most rigid sexual health agendas in the Western world.

It began immediately. One of George W. Bush's first acts as president was to issue an executive memorandum reinstating a global abortion "gag rule." The rule was first implemented under Ronald Reagan but revoked during the two Clinton administrations. The rule prohibited federally funded family planning providers from even discussing abortion with their clients.

Bush's order reflected the views of those at farthest reaches of the Christian right, zealots who saw any means by which women controlled reproduction as unbiblical:

"I would like to outlaw contraception...contraception is disgusting -- people using each other for pleasure." -Joseph Scheidler, Pro-Life Action League

"I don't think Christians should use birth control. You consummate your marriage as often as you like -- and if you have babies, you have babies." Randall Terry, Operation Rescue

Over the next twelve months the administration moved quickly to install similarly-minded Christian fundamentalists to positions of authority and influence over all matters relating to reproductive and sexual health.

Dr. Alma Golden: appointed Deputy Assistant Secretary of Population Affairs. A Texas pediatrician, she is a longtime proponent of abstinence as the only acceptable means of birth control. Dr. Golden declared that henceforth the department would stress "abstinence-only" as the solution to unwanted pregnancies, not just for teens, but unmarried adults as well.

Tom Coburn: Former Republican congressman and anti-condom crusader. Appointed co-chair of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV and AIDS. While in congress Coburn tried to force condom manufacturers to label condoms as "ineffective" against the spread of sexually transmitted infections. "I will challenge the national focus on condom use to prevent the spread of HIV," Coburn said upon his appointment.

Dr. Joseph McIlhaney, Jr.: Appointed to Coburn on the HIV and AIDS advisory council. McIlhaney has a long and well-documented history of disseminating misleading data on condom failure rates. He was appointed in spite of the fact that in 1995 Governor George W. Bush's own Texas Commissioner of Health openly denounced McIhaney's anti-condom propaganda and his professional credibility.

Dr. W. David Hager: Appointed to the FDA's Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee. Dr. Hager served as spokesperson for the Christian Medical Association. He authored the book, As Jesus Cared for Women: Restoring Women Then and Now, and co-authored a book that recommended scripture readings and prayers to relieve the symptoms of PMS. Dr. Hager opposes prescribing contraceptives to unmarried women and spearheaded a petition drive by the Christian Medical Association to revoke the FDA's approval of mifepristone, the so-called "morning after pill."

Dr. Joseph B. Stanford: Also appointed to the Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee.

Dr. Stanford is on record for his belief that the only acceptable form of contraception, besides abstinence, is the all-natural "rhythm method." Dr. Stanford refuses to prescribe contraceptives, stating that "(modern) medicine is permeated with attitudes toward sexuality and fertility that are incompatible with Christian values of the sanctity of life, marriage, and procreation, attitudes that both reflect and perpetuate the recreational approach to sexuality found in our secular culture."

Susan A. Crockett: The third Christian fundamentalist appointed to the same FDA committee. Crockett served as a board member of the American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

She co-authored, "Using Hormone Contraceptives is a Decision Involving Science, Scripture, and Conscience" in the book, The Reproductive Revolution: A Christian Appraisal of Sexuality, Reproductive Technologies and the Family. The book was edited by Dr. Hager.

When the hot issue of stem-cell research came up, President Bush dismissed two members of his Council on Bioethics who had each strongly supported the use of embryonic stem cells in research.

They were replaced by three new members who, as the pro-life Family Research Council reported, "fall more in line with the President's pro-life views."

Information became a prime target of the Christian Taliban. President Bush says he respects "good science," when making public policy. But, the crux of the matter apparently hinges on the definition of "good," especially when it comes to family-planning issues. When good science clashes with Biblical fundamentalist beliefs in this administration, science loses every time.

Early in 2001 Bush's Christian Taliban began scrubbing federal information sources of offending materials. The censorship campaign prompted Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) to send a letter to o HHS Secretary Thompson demanding an explanation for the removal of information from the HHS Web site of scientific findings by the National Cancer Institute that, contrary to anti-choice propaganda, abortions do not increase the risk of breast cancer. Thompson never responded but the "cleansing" continued.

Scientific data on condom use, long available on government health Web sites, was removed and replaced by sermons on abstinence and alarmist propaganda that exaggerated the risks of condom use.

The phrase "reproductive health" was expunged and replaced with the vague terms "related clinical preventive health services" and "related preventive health services."

Links to non-governmental family planning resources were deleted.

Web sites at the Centers of Disease Control and National Institute of Health were cleared of scientific studies and materials relating to abortion and condom use.

At the CDC results from a peer-reviewed study showing that education about condom use did not result in increased sexual activity or sex at younger age, were deleted from the Web site.

The NIH's Web site was cleaned of FAQ's on condom effectiveness and a sexuality education curriculum called "Programs that Work."

Good science was disappearing from government publications and Web sites at such a pace that the Union of Concerned Scientists issued a report in early 2004 documenting and condemning the Bush administration.

There is significant evidence that the scope and scale of the manipulation, suppression and misrepresentation of science by the Bush administration is unprecedented... There is a well-established pattern of suppression and distortion of scientific findings by high-ranking Bush administration political appointees across numerous federal agencies. These actions have consequences for human health, public safety, and community well-being." (Union of Concerned Scientists, report, Scientific Integrity in Policymaking. 2004.)

So, even as the Bush administration denounced and battled Islamic religious zealotry abroad it was and is nurturing a fundamentalist Christian version here at home, much to the delight of radical right-wing Christians.

"Contrary to popular opinion, the Bible is not neutral about what kind of government we should have," states Dr. Mark Allen Ludwig, author of True Christian Government.

"God gave governments responsibility only for infrastructure and defense," according to an article by Rev. Bob Enyart, pastor of Denver Bible Church. "If government limited itself to its two just functions, thereby getting out of education, health care, farming, etc., it could better defend America. ... Christians who carefully study the Bible are best qualified to teach the world how it should be governed."

One of the oldest and best-established forces in the Christian Taliban attack on secular government has been the Christian Coalition. Recently the group threw its full weight behind the President's push for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. The Christian Coalition has been conducting a "Let's Take America Back" national petition drive over the last several months, which now also includes support for the so-called Federal Marriage Amendment. The Christian Coalition mission statement states:

We are driven by the belief that people of faith have a right and a responsibility to be involved in the world around them. That involvement includes community, social and political action.

Whether on a stump, in print, over the airways the Christian Coalition is dedicated to equipping and educating God's people with the resources and information to battle against anti-family legislation.

What is remarkable is that this was accomplished without significant public outcry. The reason is that America's Christian Taliban are more public relations savvy than their Islamic counterparts. No American women are being forced to cover up, beaten for appearing in public wearing make up, or barred from the workplace. The changes being made are more subtle and less visibly shocking. They are incremental, technical, administrative -- but far-reaching.
They have also gotten away with it because we Americans like to consider ourselves tolerant and respectful of religious beliefs. Openly criticizing someone's religious beliefs ranks right up there with racism and bigotry -- a fact the Christian Right has used to stifle opposition to its agenda.
Mainstream Christians share secularists' concern over workings of Bush's Christian Taliban.

Speaking at the National Press Club last year, Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice President Rev. Carlton W. Veazey condemned the "back-door attempts by the Bush Administration to radically alter policies and practices concerning abortion, family planning, and sexuality education to conform to extreme views."

So, it may be time to admit that our tolerance of Christian fundamentalists is turning us into a nation of chumps. By claiming it is they who are being persecuted, the Christian Taliban have cowed mainstream Christians and secularists into silence, even as they impose their own faith-based governance upon us.

We need to reconnect with a fundamental ingredient of America's strength: the separation of church and state. That wall of separation has for over two centuries spared Americans ftom the kind of religious strife witnessed in Bosnia, the Middle East, Northern Ireland and Afghanistan.
Mixing religious dogma and public policy always creates an explosive compound -- and it always blows.

2004 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
� Go Back


http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=18259

Alter Net women

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

PULL OVER, NASCAR DADS
Katha Pollitt, The Nation
Single women voters are fans of progressive change. So why
don't the Democrats offer them something progressive? Like
pay equity, universal public preschool, or heck, free birth
control.
*In Election 2004: here

THE POWERFUL WOMEN PROBLEM
Susan J. Douglas, In These Times
The Bush administration has more women in powerful
positions than any in history. Unfortunately, that's
nothing to cheer about.
here

JUST DOING MY JOB
Sandip Roy, Pacific News Service
Prostitutes in India are insisting the only way to protect
themselves against AIDS is through their own empowerment.
*In Rights & Liberties: here

Alter Net

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

BAD TIMES FOR BRAND MARTHA
here

�"Company founders have long believed that placing their name on
�their company signals their willingness to stake their personal
�reputation and stand behind their products," observes the
�University of Pennsylvania's business school. "That's fine when
�things are going well and the company and the CEO whose name it
�bears are held in high regard. But what if the CEO falls from
�grace? What happens to a company if the CEO's name is in effect its
�brand o and then that name is tarnished? Rarely has that question
�come up more sharply than in the case of Martha Stewart, America's
�long-reigning diva of decor, who was recently convicted on
�conspiracy and other charges. ... When it is done right, brand
�personification can tap into the human desire to belong to a
�community. In the case of Martha Stewart ... customers could
�virtually lose their identity to that of the brand."
More web links related to this story are available at:
� here

To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
� here

SPINNING SPIN SISTERS
here

�"St. Martin's Press has brought in Shirley & Banister Public
�Affairs to drum up conservative support for a new book accusing
�women's magazines of a liberal bend and constant focus on the 'woes
�of womanhood,'" reports O'Dwyer's PR Daily. "Former Ladies Home
�Journal editor-in-chief, Myrna Blyth, penned the tome, Spin
�Sisters: How the Women of the Media Sell Unhappiness and Liberalism
�to the Women of America. In it she charges the $7 billion industry
�and a 'Girls' Club' of female media elites are exploiting female
�emotions and hawking a left-of-center, do-gooder agenda to their
�audience." Shirley & Banister is a PR firm that "specializes in
�getting authors onto conservative talk-radio programs."
SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR Daily (requires subscription), March 25, 2004
More web links related to this story are available at:
� here

To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
� here

Friday, March 26, 2004

Pierceless Pubs

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

===
Georgia House votes 160-0 to ban genital piercings for women
# with comments by H&HH and Phillip S.
here

Wednesday, March 24, 2004

Protect you Privates

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

PROTECTING YOUR PRIVATES
Michael Ventura, Austin Chronicle
Americans have been led to believe that their medical
histories would remain confidential. Now, in a radical
flip-flop, the Bush-Ashcroft Justice Department wants
hospitals and clinics to turn over thousands of records.
here

Monday, March 22, 2004

March for Women's Lives

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

BE A PART OF HISTORY
Hello March Supporters,
Thank you for joining the March for Women's Lives. Together we will make
this March the largest in history. Imagine marching with thousands of
women, men and children as far as the eye can see- the sound of all those
marching feet- thanks to everyone's grassroots organizing work! � �
This March is historic on many levels. This is the first time that the
Civil Rights Community has joined the Women's Movement to march for all of
our reproductive rights. In the future you are going to want to say that
you were a part of the March For Women's Lives, like people remember being
a part of the Civil Rights marches and the Peace marches. Don't allow your
friends, neighbors, co-workers and relatives let the mundane activities of
their lives weigh them down and prevent them from joining!
Over 1000 organizations are Co-Sponsors for the March! �The American Civil
Liberties Union has become a major Organizer, along with Black Women's
Health Imperative, Feminist Majority, NARAL Pro-Choice America, National
Latina Institute for Reproductive Health, National Organization for Women
(NOW), and Planned Parenthood Federation of America. The NAACP and the
Sierra Club are new Co-Sponsoring organizations.
This is history in the making. Everyone who can be - MUST be here!
BRING YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS TO THE MARCH
Individuals are welcome to March independently, but it's more enjoyable to
march with a group. All you need is 20 friends, family members, neighbors,
and/or co-workers to agree to attend and march together, and you are a
Delegation! �Think of all the groups you belong to. Recruit friends from
your alumni club, health club, reading group, or Meet Up group to form an
Informal Delegation. Each of your friends will know friends who will want
to be part of your Delegation.
Friends from all over the country can be a part of your group - one
delegation organizer is bringing together her friends from college to join
her for the March-making the March a reunion.

GET ORGANIZED
Register your group as a 'Delegation'. �Visit the here
homepage, click onto 'Form a Delegation' and fill in the form. You can also
telephone 202/349-3838 or fax 202/349-3839 the March office with your
contact information, delegation size, and travel plans. Let us know how you
choose to march-along with other delegations from your state, along with a
participating major organization, as part of a contingent, or some other
way. For example, a delegation can march with their state, or with a major
organization (like ACLU) and also send one member to represent their
delegation in one of the contingents that are developing: Women of Color,
Healthcare/Medical, LGBT, Domestic Violence, Peace, International, etc. The
member sent to join a contingent can carry a sign with the name of the
delegation they represent. �
Once registered, you will receive periodic Delegation email updates. Please
keep the March Office updated on your progress by updating your online
form-- it's exciting to see the numbers increasing!
Have a good time! �While you are organizing and fundraising for the trip
think up ways to make the trip memorable and enjoyable. Have a poster
making, T-shirt signing party. Check out
here PDF for fundraising ideas.
Consider attending area Meet-Ups to find others interested in the March.
You can invite Meetup
participants into your delegation. For more information, please visit
here
Available to all registered March website users, the Bulletin Board is an
excellent organizing tool and allows you to communicate with other Marchers
about many different topics including: co-sponsoring, forming a delegation,
transportation ideas, and organizing methods. Check it out and contribute
to our ongoing discussions as April 25th gets closer and closer! See the
link on the website Home page.
If you're coming in from out of town, remember to check the March for
Women's Lives Travel Guide. The Travel Guide contains important information
about getting to DC, directions to car and bus parking, pre-ordering your
delegation's Metro farecards, and links to area hotels. �You can download
and print out a coupon for discounted travel to and from the airports.
All this is just a click away at here.
If you're coming by bus, please remember to register it. Update your
delegation's bus information at here by clicking
"Form A Delegation." �Scroll down to find the question about transportation.
If, for any reason, you cannot walk the March route or stand for the Rally,
we have open trolleys to ride in for the March and seating for the Rally,
available by reservation. The trolley reservation deadline is 3/26. Please
contact the March office as soon as possible with the names of those
needing reservations [lgalib@marchforwomen.org or call202/349-3836]. �
� � �
T-shirts and button ordering information is now available at the website.
Link from the website home page. �

DON'T BE LATE
Be on time-the program starts at 10am. We are using the National Mall from
14th St. to 3rd St.. Once you reach the Mall, locate one of the many March
volunteers (will be clearly identifiable) surrounding the perimeter of the
Mall. Tell the volunteer the name of your delegation. The volunteer will
look at a chart and tell you where to join your delegation. The Morning
stage (14th St.end) program starts at 10am. The March steps off at 12 noon
from the 14th Street end. The afternoon stage (3rd St end) program runs
from 1 to ~4p.m. There will be speakers, entertainment, and celebrities at
both stages.
�
PLEASE VOLUNTEER
We need thousands of volunteers for the day of the March (bus greeters,
Mall perimeter volunteers to direct arriving delegations, march-route
marshals, volunteer tent, lost and found, medical/EMT, after Rally cleanup,
etc.).
Contact Volunteer Coordinator Linda Lawson at: llawson@marchforwomen.org if
you can help.

REMEMBER
We're making History! �As we are demonstrating, we are also celebrating our
power in numbers too large to ignore. The anti-choice minority seeks to
overturn Roe v. Wade. The day after Roe v. Wade is overturned, we don't
want to wish we had done more today. The fate of reproductive rights is in
your hands. Women across the world call on us to march for reproductive
justice.
On April 25th we will show the world that we ARE the majority!
-------------------------------------
March for Women's Lives
National Office.
(202) 349-3838

Coercive Medicine

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

COERCIVE MEDICINE
Lynn M. Paltrow, TomPaine.com
Courts and medical organizations have long recognized a
patient's right to make healthcare decisions free from
governmental intrusion. Why should pregnant women have
fewer rights than other patients?
here

Friday, March 19, 2004

is "50 Cent" worth a plugged nickel?

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

RAPPER 50 CENT'S GAY PROBLEM
Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet
Black contempt for gays -- recently spelled out by rapper
50 Cent in a Playboy interview -- is hardly new.
here

Wednesday, March 17, 2004

Martha

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

I heard your daughter tell Larry King that you feel you've wasted your life.

I heard the gossip -slash- commentary, as you left the courtroom. They said you appeared unremorseful, with a hint of a smile.

I saw your face. That was no smile. That was the set jaw of a mortified woman, refusing to give the gathered jackels the satisfaction of seeing you cry. Your eyes looked haunted, grieving, determined to maintain dignity.

I burst into tears, remembering when the paramedics put me in an ambulance, as police officers stifled tears and whispered, "go with them, Rogi. Don't resist."

Some man, in civilian clothes, had entered my home without my permission, shoved me around, threatened to have me arrested, screamed obscenities at me. He said he was a fire marshal, but I never saw any I.D.

When I told him I'd have to ask him to leave, he called UNM Mental Health and had a doctor order a psychiatric evaluation on me.

Everybody else present -- Adult Protective Services, the police, a minister, Animal Control -- knew I was in my right mind and trying to do the right thing.

But this man wanted me punished for trying to defend my rights and my home.

I still don't know who he was. I think I saw him on the local news once, about a possible arson fire.

The cops were supposed to help me with my yard, so the War Zone kids had a safe place to play, study, eat. My home was a refuge from abuse, neglect and overwhelm.

Instead, they tore out my fruit trees and filled their ditches. They threw away garlic, growing in planters in my yard, which I'd planned to sell. They threw away all my bottle neck gourds, which I'd just begun to carve and paint into bird houses to sell. They threw out a hundred dollars' worth of bulbs, herbs, flowers and vegetables.

They threw away my bicycle: my only transportation. They threw out the kids' toys in the yard. They threw away my tools and my security lights, my only defense -- besides my dogs -- against drug addicts.

They even threw away my clean laundry, hanging to dry on the porch.

They blocked the gate, so I couldn't close it, by moving a storage building in its way. They threw out the side panel of my motor home, so I couldn't lock or secure it.

I'd been removed, by a fireman, from my home while they did this. He said he was taking me to buy groceries. He was really keeping me from protecting my property, so I wouldn't "interfere."

By the time I returned, my lush garden was reduced to rocks and dirt.

But it didn't stop there.

When this "fire marshal" came, he condemned my home for water damage from a bad roof. I pointed to roofing materials, delivered that week, up on the roof. I was to repair the roof for reduced rent.

He wouldn't listen. That's when Animal Control was called.

As I was being placed in the ambulance, I saw my cats and dogs, frantic, in cages, in a van, in the hot, July sun.

Every kid in the 'hood stood silently, safely away from this Ground Zero, witnessing. And I thought, what a bad example I've set: "if you TRY to make a difference, this is what we'll do to you."

I watched them string yellow "caution" ribbon around the property and duct tape a "condemned: substandard housing" poster to my front door.

The paramedic took my vitals as we drove to the hospital. She remarked that, except for slightly-elevated respiration, she was surprised that my blood pressure and pulse were normal, given the circumstances.

So, Martha, I know how you felt when you left that courtroom.

They burned another witch.

The longest I was at the hospital was waiting for the local minister to give me a ride back to what was left of my home.

When I returned, some neighbors were rounding up my ducks, chickens and geese. A couple I barely knew persuaded Animal Control that my animals and I could stay with them, in Moriarty.

I was evicted on the spot. I could only return, during daylight hours, for the next fifteen days, to retrieve whatever I could. I had no vehicle and would be staying with strangers, over twenty miles away.

It was Friday before a three-day, July 4th weekend, 4:00 pm. I couldn't contact a lawyer nor anybody else. After all, it was the Albuquerque Police and Fire Departments and Bernallilo County Adult Protection Services who'd done this to me. To whom would I complain?

That weekend, my neighbors broke in and robbed me. They found my check book and emptied out my Social Security Disability check.

I was homeless and penniless, and at the mercy of strangers who had an agenda I won't discuss here. Let's just leave it at: they didn't take me in out of the goodness of their hearts.

All my animals, except one cat and one dog, died or disappeared. I even had a little Hymalaian Siamese I'd rescued from a dumpster outside an abandoned apartment building. I'd named her, "Martha," after your cats.

I don't know if it was coyotes, feral dogs, or the couple's son, whom I'd caught dangling a hangman's noose over my dog's head once.

I do know that my things began disappearing, and that I caught that kid with them.

I was sick, when they put me in that ambulance. I hadn't eaten all day. I'd been up late, the night before, working in my yard.

I'd been beaten by a mentally ill man who was stalking me, climbing on my roof, opening windows, tearing up my fence. He stole my dog several times, to bait me.

I'd gone to his house to get my dog. He was crouched behind his wall, waiting for me. He grabbed my wrist, tried to pull off my dress, beat me in the head.

I'd called the police several times about him. They wouldn't take reports. But they had me down as a "nuisance," for calling so often.

Even as I stood in the street, dress torn, blood streaming from my head, they said the wouldn't report it because they hadn't witnessed it. And a restraining order would cost me $50.

I was issued a citation for having my dog running loose, even though the stalker stole him, and for not having dog tages, even though the stalker stole the dog collar. I had the dog's paperwork in the house, but who knows what happened to it.

I didn't get the citation, because I was homeless. The court issued a "failure to appear" warrant, when I didn't show up for the court date.

I tried to clear it up, but the court clerk said I'd have to pay $340, just to see a judge.

I said, "I can't afford that; I live on Social Security. What should I do?"

She said, "get the hell out of here, before I have you booked!"

So, I have a warrant, eight years later, for my arrest.

His beating, it seems, broke a tooth. Now, all my teeth are rotting and falling out.

I went to UNM Hospital, complaining of head pain; I explained I'd been beaten. They brushed it off as depression and sent me away unexamined and untreated.

My belly, that day in the ambulance, still hurt from losing my daughter, the previous year. Her death nearly killed me. I can't tell you the pain.

The father left me to fend for myself, keep the lights on, get new roommates. I almost lost the house then, because I was too sick from surgery to get everything done.

I dedicated my garden to my daughter. Every year, on the Vernal Equinox -- which would have been her approxemate birth date, had she survived -- I planted something special in the garden for her.

The police threw out that year's tulips.

I opened my home to the neighbor kids as a memorial to her. I taught them everything you teach on your programs, Martha: how to do things for yourself, how to be creative, interested, resourceful.

One of my best memories was a day, right before Christmas.

A flock of preteen girls, bespangled in plastic jewelry, giga pets and sparkle lip balm, cussed like sailors in the Crafts Room, putting up shelving with hammers and drills.

In the kitchen, gang banger wannabe boys, in baggies and do rags, slaved over hot pots of candy on the stove.

We were cooking a gingerbread tree, covered in candies and cookies, so we could all have something for Christmas. The boys were making truffles and lollipops.

I heard one say, "That ain't softball stage, foo'! Shoot, man, you gotta read the damn thermometer!"

I was standing in the hallway, between the girls and the boys, and just laughed 'til I cried.

The last time I was in that house, police were looking for narcotics. They thought I was running a gang out of my home.

They thought I was a Satanist. They'd come out, the previous summer, to investigate our Pow Wow.

The kids and I had dug, with permission from the local fire station, a small fire pit in the front yard for a pow wow fire.

We made fry bread and Navajo tacos. We sold sodas and candy.

We made ceremonial clothing. We decorated "drums," made of five gallon paint buckets.

We called the Four Directions, burned juniper, because we had no cedar, and prayed.

We danced and sang. Neighbor men brought their "old ladies," kids, dogs and drums to help us celebrate.

We'd built a fence around the front yard, to keep poultry in and crack heads out. Each kid painted his or her own boards, all different colors, and painted their prayers and pictures on them. We called it our "prayer fence."

We had memorial boards for the dead, the wounded, the missing. The boards were decorated with happy faces, stars, flowers.

"Why," said a member of the all-white, English-only Gang Unit, "is that fire pit in a circle?"

"'cause it's hard to dig a triangle, I guess," I replied.

"How come you've got five-pointed stars, painted on this fence?"

"How come there are five-pointed stars on the flag," I replied.

"What are you and the kids doing with these chickens?"

"Oh, no, you think I'm a Satanist, don't you?"

"Well, you seem to know an awful lot about it!"

His police report stated falsely that I was a paranoid schizophrenic and a self-proclaimed witch. No other police officer in this town would ever take me seriously again, while I was being stalked.

Now, Martha, I could have laid down, right then, in that ambulance, and died.

I was useless. I was a failure as a mother. I was a failure as a community activist. I was a failure as a home maker. I was a failure as a woman.

Talk about feeling like your life is wasted!

It has taken me almost ten years to recover, and I know I never will.

But I walk three miles round trip, two days a week, to get to this radio station to volunteer.

I operate eight news blogs at my domain, rriverstone.com.

I eat and wear what I find in dumpsters, when necessary. I still grow my own food.

I'm going to try to raise some duck pond eggs for chicks.

If your life is wasted, what does that say about mine?

Your daughter LIVES! You have family! You have friends!

You have money and connections! You built an empire!

When they put me in that ambulance that day, I had nothing. I had no one. My daughter was dead; I was homeless; I was penniless.

If you believe you're defeated, they've won, Martha!

Never stop. Never quit. Never give them the satisfaction!

Sincerely,

Rogi Riverstone

Happy Birthday, Viri Diana

Love,

Mommy

Alter Net women

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

here

SEXUAL SEGREGATION
William Jelani Cobb, Africana.com
The specter of black men having sex with white women has
been utilized to justify everything from lynching to
segregation. The case of one scholar-athlete in Georgia
shows that old racial habits die hard.
here

LETTER FROM JUAREZ
Mariana Katzarova, The Nation
Although the murders of young women in Juarez continue,
awareness grows and groups are mobilizing to support
victims and solve the crimes.
here

QUESTIONABLE FREEDOM
Janet Miller, AlterNet
When a New York Times writer decided to buy two Cambodian
sex workers, he ended up doing more harm than good.
*In Rights & Liberties: here

Tuesday, March 16, 2004

'Rush Limbaugh attacks widows and children'

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

Maureen Farrell: 'Rush Limbaugh attacks widows and children'
Date: Tuesday, March 16 @ 10:14:20 EST
Topic: Hate Radio
By Maureen Farrell, BuzzFlash

"Most of us here in the media are what I consider infotainers.... Rush Limbaugh is what I call a disinfotainer. He entertains by spreading disinformation." --Al Franken at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, April 23, 1994

Given his history, people expect Rush Limbaugh to skew a few facts.

After all, in Limbaugh Land, Democrats and liberals are the boogiemen in America's closet, even when a mountain of evidence suggests otherwise. When he recently defended Howard Stern, for example, he automatically tacked on the usual spin. "If the government is going to 'censor' what they think is right and wrong, what happens if a whole bunch of John Kerrys, or Terry McAuliffes start running this country?" he wondered.

Never mind, of course, that the religious right is actively trying to turn America into a theocracy [MoscowTimes.ru] or that the FCC is headed by Colin Powell's son.

In a subsequent op-ed, Limbaugh challenged the notion that Stern was dropped from six Clear Channel stations because he criticized the president. "So are we now going to popularize loony conspiracy theories from the left-wing fringe to defend Howard Stern?" Limbaugh asked, overlooking the glaring fact that the "left-wing fringe" included conservative talk show host Charles Goyette, who openly admitted, on both NPR and in The American Conservative, that he was banished "to radio Outer Darkness" due to the "oil-and-water incompatibility of these two seemingly disconnected phrases: 'Criticizing Bush' and 'Clear Channel.'"

All that aside, Limbaugh's recent remarks directed at two Sept. 11 widows veer so far off his worn propaganda path that they bypass his "insensitive and inappropriate" statements concerning Donovan McNabb and venture into the realm of another shameful moment in broadcast history -- when he lit into 13-year-old Chelsea Clinton in 1993. "Everyone knows the Clintons have a cat. Socks is the White House cat. But did you know there is a White House dog?" Limbaugh said on TV, before holding up a picture Chelsea.

What could be worse than that?

Accusing 9/11 widows of being political shills comes crassly close.

"I can now begin to take credit for some things that happened on this program on Friday - A barnburner of a program," Rush declared on March 9. "You remember the program opened with some audio examples that we had found of families, certain family members, 9-11 victims, all saying the same things. And I cringed. I couldn't believe that the Democratic Party would sink this low, to exploit and capitalize on the misery and loss of families. But they did it. They found a way. In fact, they found some family members - and I'm going to say this - they found some family members who seemed to have more concern over who the president of this country is than over the sanctity of the loss of their own family members."

Limbaugh replayed an audio montage, featuring the voices of Sept. 11 widows Kristen Breitweiser and Monica Gabrielle, who, he warned, "are actually part of the Democratic Party machine."

VOICE I: I think for someone like President Bush who has not cooperated with this commission, who has stonewalled this commission.

VOICE II: This president and his administration blocked the creation of the commission, have stonewalled the commission.

VOICE I: If this was realistic from the morning of September 11th, it would show President Bush before a group of school children listening to them read, while the twin towers were burning.

VOICE II: If he wants to show a picture of 9-11 depicting what he was doing, it should be a picture of him sitting and reading in a classroom to school children.
That's where he was on 9-11.

VOICE I: And we need to find out why 3,000 people were murdered on his watch.

VOICE II: Well, you know, this happened on his watch.

"This is two different women, and they appeared on four networks: CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, and NBC, and they each have three phrases that they use verbatim," Rush explained.

"These were prepared by Democratic campaign consultants. In fact, these women sound like campaign consultants, not grieving family members, and I was reluctant to make this charge; it's the first thing that crossed my mind. As I say, we've now learned all the organizational effort that's going on behind this and these people are indeed aligned with the Democratic Party. . . " [RushLimbaugh.com]

Of course, anyone who's been following the saga of these women knows how ridiculous this assertion is. "For your information, I am one of the widows you are wrongly accusing of being 'schooled' by the Democratic party," Breitweiser reportedly wrote, in an open letter to Limbaugh. "I am not a Democrat. I voted for President Bush. So did my husband who was killed on 9/11. I would encourage you to educate yourself on who I am, prior to your making erroneous statements about me on your radio show."

"I expect an apology for your false statements and erroneous accusations," Gabrielle reportedly wrote Limbaugh. "NO Democratic or other party member 'schooled' me or prepared my statements!. . . Neither I, nor the Family Steering Committee has received ANY FUNDING from ANY person or organization. . . . The attacking of 9/11 families with false, inflammatory statements is beneath even you. Unfortunately, it accomplishes nothing and serves only avoid the real issues. [911citizenswatch.org]

Both widows also directed Rush to the 9/11 Family Steering Committee's Web site, which explains their apolitical mission.

"We have been accused of being tutored by a particular political party to make statements against the current administration. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are Americans who care about the future of this country. Our nonpartisan mission has always been clear: to find out how 9/11 happened so that nothing like it will ever happen again," the Web site reads, before making it clear the 9/11 Family Steering Committee seeks to rectify the problems that led to "widespread government failures, encompassing current AND prior administrations."
[911independentcommission.org]

Unfortunately, Limbaugh isn't the only pundit casting suspicion on the widows' motives. When Kristen Breitweiser appeared on Hardball on Dec. 18, Chris Matthews seemed to grasp the larger picture. "I think, in order for us to make sure as a country that 9/11 will never happen again, we need to make sure that the individuals who are responsible for the failures are held accountable," Breitweiser said.

"It sounds like the problem is at the top," Matthews later responded. [Scoop.co.nz]

But two weeks ago, when Matthews hosted Monica Gabrielle, that flicker of recognition was gone.

After Gabrielle chronicled Bush's dismal record on Sept. 11, Matthews expected the grieving widow to understand G.W.'s "war president" campaign strategy. "If this president's going to run for re-election as a war president, if he's going to advance his cause and maybe the majority of the country's cause that we're in a war against terrorism, how can he fight that fight without mentioning what happened to us and then showing what happened to us dramatically, [on] 9/11?" Matthews asked.

But as Gabrielle tried to explain why using Sept 11 as a political platform was distasteful regardless of political persuasion, Matthews honed in:

MATTHEWS: So just to try to help the audience understand, your complaint here, it's not at the ads, that he's using 9/11 in the ads. Your complaint is he won't�he hasn't been forthcoming as to the details of what his policy was before 9/11 and his preparedness.

GABRIELLE: I disagree. I also find the ads tasteless. I don't want to see 9/11 used in a political forum as a platform for the Republicans to promote.

MATTHEWS: Let me ask you�Let me ask you a tough question. Are you a Democrat or a Republican?

GABRIELLE: Politics doesn't have anything to do with it.

MATTHEWS: What are you?

GABRIELLE: Independent. I don't...

MATTHEWS: Did you vote for Bush in 2000?
[MSNBC]

And so it goes. To media shills, everything is political, the surface is all, and spin is substance. And despite the fact that the Firefighters of America also said that "the use of 9/11 images" is "hypocrisy at its worst" and that that Bush has "basically shortchanged fire fighters and the safety of our homeland" [USNewswire.com], the widows' message is lost.

"We don't care about politics. We never did. What we care about is finding out why this nation was so vulnerable to terrorists on the morning of 9/11. What we care about is making sure that something like that never happens again," Breitweiser recently said. [CNN]

So how consistent has the widows' message been? If you look at their record, way back when (when the Democrats were still cowering), they were fighting for truth, justice and the American way. In fact, within months of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, Skyscraper Safety Campaign co-chairman Gabrielle was penning letters to editors [Skyscrapersafety.org] while, in Aug. 2002, Breitweiser came out swinging on Donahue.

"I saw a picture of the president, I think it was Newsweek or Time, and I read the caption. And the caption said, you know, 'Andy Card telling the president about the second plane' And then I read that he proceeded to read for 25 minutes to the 2nd-graders, Breitweiser said. "And I read it again, and I thought it was. . . misreported. And it wasn't, and I got upset.. . . And I-I am concerned. I want to know why the Secret Service did not whisk him away. I want to know why he is the commander-in-chief of the United States of America, our country was clearly under attack, it was after the second building was hit. I want to know why he sat there [at Emma E. Booker Elementary School] for 25 minutes. . .
I'm a reasonable person. But when you look at the fact that we spend a half trillion dollars on national defense and you're telling me that a plane is able to hit our Pentagon, our Defense Department, an hour after the first tower is hit? There are procedures and protocols in place in this nation that are to be followed when transponders are disconnected, and they were not followed on September 11th."

Delving into everything from NORAD oddities to her sisterhood with fellow 9/11 widows, Breitweiser also explained the nature of their mission:

"At this point, we are fighting for an independent investigation, an investigation into 9/11 removed from the political process. . . . . We want politics removed. We want pure accountability, and we feel that an independent investigation is needed to have that.
We've had independent investigations with regard to Pearl Harbor, with regard to the shuttle accident. If there's a car accident, you have an investigation. We have waited 11 months, and I think it is deplorable that these women and myself have to leave our children, our homes, and go down to Washington and beg for answers. To have the right to have answers, we have to beg. And it's disgusting. . .
This country is not safe. I want to feel safe in this country. And I think that, to quote Edmund Burke, all that is needed for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing. And at this point, the families feel that way. We feel that nothing is being done to make this country safe." [Scoop.co.nz]

Since then, Breitweiser and Gabrielle have been tireless in their fight to protect all Americans. And Limbaugh's gross distortions aside, this montage reveals a much more accurate glimpse of their dedication.

VOICE I: "You know, I'm frustrated. I don't understand why we all do not share the same mission, which is to make this nation safe. And I don't understand why this commission has had roadblock after roadblock after roadblock. And we all want this nation to be safe. And I think because it's an election year, that's ridiculous. We should be safe here, not because it's an election year, not because people are embarrassed. We need to fix these problems, problems that have been made readily apparent in hearings. People need to care about this." � Kristen Breitweiser (American Morning, CNN, Feb. 5, 2004)

VOICE II: "We've been fighting for nearly 21 months -- fighting the administration, the White House. As soon as we started looking for answers we were blocked, put off and ignored at every stop of the way." � Monica Gabrielle ("Bush's 9/11 Cover-up?" Salon.com, June 18, 2003)

VOICE I: "If you were to tell me that two years after the murder of my husband that we wouldn't have one question answered, I wouldn't believe it." -- Kristen Breitweiser ("911 Chair: Attack Was Preventable," CBS News, Dec.18, 2003)

VOICE II: "In the course of two years we've had no accountability, no responsibility. You don't have a failure this large without many hands having screwed up." -- Monica Gabrielle ("Connecticut Families Brace For Second Anniversary Of 9-11:Attacks Transformed Many Families Into Activists," wnbc.com, Sept. 11, 2003)

VOICE I � "If we have an executive branch that holds sole discretion over what information is released to the public and what is hidden, the public will never get the full story of why there was an utter failure to protect them that day, and who should be held accountable." -- Kristen Breitweiser, ("Four 9/11 Moms Battle Bush," The New York Observer, Aug.25, 2003)

VOICE II:" Whatever President Bush and his administration may think, the one important point to remember is this: Since 9/11, they have stonewalled and prevented a transparent investigation of that horrific day. This is the echo that should be reverberating throughout our country." -- Monica Gabrielle, ("G.O.P. Campaign Evades 9/11 Truths" NY Times, Letter to the Editor, Aug. 3, 2003)

VOICE I: "I'm very disappointed in the press. I've been scheduled to go on Meet the Press and Hardball so many times and I'm always canceled. Frankly I'd like nothing better than to go head to head with Dick Cheney on Meet the Press. Because somebody needs to ask the questions and I don't understand why nobody is." -- Kristin Breitweiser ("Bush's 9/11 Cover-up?" Salon.com, June 18, 2003)

VOICE II: "I am doing this [rejecting millions in compensation] for my husband. He was a gentle man, and he was alive, trying to get out of that building that day. The dead. The dying. The smoke. The terror. No one should have suffered like that. I want accountability. I need answers." � Monica Gabrielle, ("Families Sue U.S., Reject 9/11 'Bribe': Ignore Deadline for Compensation," The Toronto Star, Dec. 23, 2003)

Get the picture? Unfortunately, it seems that if you ask questions -- or openly criticize King George's commercials -- Rush Limbaugh will accuse you of being an operative for the Democrats. And sadly, many dittoheads, blind to the truth, will listen to him and believe.

"I'm saying to myself, 'This can't be. The Democrats have not given these poor widows talking points. This just can't be,'" Limbaugh said on March 5, the first time he played the audio of Breitweiser and Gabrielle's statements. "They're going to make me level this accusation? They're going to?" I mean, I'm an observer of life. I watch the news; I see this. If you saw it, too, I'm sure you had to come to the same conclusion. And I'm sitting, saying to myself, 'Can it possibly be that the Democrats are out there accusing George Bush of running an attack ad and capitalizing politically on the attack of 9/11, have actually gotten hold of some widows, some family members, and gave them talking points?'

Because when you listen to what they say, they're all saying the same thing about where Bush was when this happened, and I keep saying, 'There's nothing these people do that will surprise me anymore, nothing the Democrats, nothing the liberals will do. They can't go any lower than they are. They can't have any more hatred than they have. They can't be more bitter than they are,' and they continue to surprise me. They can become angrier. They do become more embittered. They do get slimier!. . .
[T]hose people [Breitweiser and Gabrielle] and do not sound like victims; they sound like they've been coached. They sound like they have been faxed talking points, do they not? . . . .In the midst of all of these accusations of how low Bush can go, and how dirty Bush is and what an attack ad this was, to go get these family members and coach them -- and it's obvious. It's obvious they have been faxed something, or given something. Listen to this again. Now, the names are not relevant, but they're... Let me count the number of people here. One, two, three. There are two members here. There are two women here both saying the same things, but again, this is taken from three different -- well, four different networks -- CNN, NBC, CNBC, and MSNBC. " [RushLimbaugh.com]

It's great that Limbaugh kicked his drug habit. But he should get also work on getting his facts straight.
Anyone who's been paying attention for the past two years realizes that regardless what Rush thinks, Kristen Breitweiser and Monica Gabrielle are not "actually part of the Democratic Party machine."

"I cannot relate to being obsessed with all this hatred. I just don't get it. It is unspeakable to me. It is dirty. It is wounding, " Limbaugh said on March 9, while smearing these Sept. 11 widows a second time.

Considering how Rush has slandered and misrepresented these women, he should be deeply and publicly ashamed.

Maureen Farrell is a writer and media consultant who specializes in helping other writers get television and radio exposure.

Copyright 2003, Maureen Farrell
Reprinted from BuzzFlash:
here

This article comes from The Smirking Chimp
here

The URL for this story is:
here

Saturday, March 13, 2004

Sound Bite from Beijing

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

SOUND - BITE FROM BEIJING
We, yes, We are rising up!
Rising from the depths of our despair.
Yes, we are rising up!
We are women of the world.
We're from the North, South, East and West
We are women of the world
We're from the mountains, the valleys, the cities and farms
We are women of the world, come from poverty, illiteracy, circumcision, shame
We are women of the world
We are housewives, 9 to 5's, mothers displaced
We are women of the world
And we're coming from Beijing ready for change
We, yes,
We are rising up!
Rising from the depths of our despair. yes,
We are rising up!
We are telling our stories and sharing our lives
So that never again can the truth be denied
We've untied our tongues and we're speaking out loud
We've unbound our feet and we're marching toward freedom
We are teaching each other and claiming our power
Together, we're building a better tomorrow.
We, yes,
We are rising up!
Rising from the depths of our despair. yes,
We are rising up!
Rising from the depths of our despair.
Women are rising, rising up!
Words and music by Ysaye M. Barnwell �1995 Barnwell's Notes Publishing (BMI)

In 1995, Sweet Honey In The Rock went to the International Women's Conference held in The Peoples Republic of China. An estimated 35-40,000 women, representing non-governmental organizations from around the world, assembled in Huairou outside of Beijing. When I returned home, I discovered that what had been described in the media here was not representative of the experience I had had. I had been commissioned to write a piece for the women's chorus of GALA Festival V and decided that the conference had provided obvious material. This song is my personal "sound-bite" on what happened at and as a result of the Beijing Womens'conference.
--Ysaye Maria Barnwell


http://www.rykodisc.com/RykoInternal/Features/361/beijing.htm

recruiting Chinese women astronauts

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

BEIJING (AFP) Mar 12, 2004

China plans to recruit women astronauts next year for future space voyages following a suggestion from China's leading women's group, state media said Friday.

Candidates are expected to be selected from not only mainland China but Hong Kong and Macau, a senior space official told Xinhua news agency.

Hu Shixiang, deputy chief commander of China's Manned Space Program, said even though China's pool of available astronauts were all highly trained men, it was possible to have less trained women on space missions.

Physical requirements for astronauts have been lowered due to the increased maturity of China's rocket and spaceship technology following successful flights involving five spaceships since 1999, Hu said.

"Healthy common people can become astronauts for space missions after specialized training thanks to China's improved space training skills and, women, of course, will be included," Hu said.

"Our selection of woman astronauts will not merely be a symbolic, image project."

. . . the All-China Women's Federation, the largest quasi-governmental women's group, has lobbied for women astronauts.

"This suggestion has been accepted by the central authorities," Gu Xiulian, president of the Federation told the Beijing Youth Daily recently.

. . . the first group of female astronauts will only need three to four years of relevant training.

Selection for female astronauts will not be confined only to the ranks of woman pilots, Hu said.

. . . Valentina Tereshkova of the Soviet Union became the first woman astronaut in the world when she was rocketed into space on June 16, 1963 aboard Vostok 6.

Sally K. Ride was the first American woman to fly aboard space shuttle Challenger in 1983


SpaceDaily

Friday, March 12, 2004

Herpes protection

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

PREVENTION AND CURE
Molly M. Ginty, Women's eNews
Herpevac promises to protect female teens from herpes. But
experts are wrestling with how to finance and administer a
vaccine designed for a sexually transmitted disease.
here

Thursday, March 11, 2004

Was Martha Stewart targeted?

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

No charges have yet been brought against former Enron chairman Ken Lay who was a close friend of President Bush and a major Republican campaign contributor, while Martha Stewart, who is a major Democratic contributor, faces up to 20 years in prison for lying to a federal investigator. [includes transcript]

The Bush presidency has been marked by war. The invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq and now the apparent overthrow of Jean-Bertrand Aristide in Haiti. But these three years have also been marked by rampant corporate crime. Enron, Tyco, Adelphia, WorldCom have all become household names. The Bush administration has said that it is a priority of the president to crack down on corporate crime. But most of the CEOs and corporate officials responsible for the collapse of huge companies and the loss of thousands of jobs walk the streets with no criminal charges and no jail sentences hanging over their heads.

No charges, for instance, have been brought against Ken Lay, who was chairman of Enron when its $9 billion collapse in 2001 ended the jobs of more than 5,000 workers and decimated the retirement savings of millions of investors. Lay is a close friend of Bush and a major Republican campaign contributor. In fact, Lay was one of his closest advisers, one of his "pioneers," raising hundreds of thousands of dollars for Bush's campaign. After Enron collapsed, Kenny Boy--as Bush referred to his friend--became Mr. Lay.

Instead, the poster-child for this new crack-down on corporate crime is Martha Stewart. She is facing up to 20 years in prison after a jury found her guilty on all charges last week for covering up her sale of ImClone stock just before the price plummeted. Quite the opposite of Lay, who is deeply tied to the Republicans, especially the Bushes, Martha Stewart is a major contributor to the Democrats. She has given more than $150,000 in political contributions--all of it to the Democrats. This according to United Press International.

The Stewart decision was frontpage news across the country. Headlines screamed "Martha Stewart convicted on all counts in stock-trading trial." But what many people don't know is that the government did not charge Stewart with insider trading. In addition, the judge threw out the most serious charge in the case - securities fraud. So what was Martha Stewart guilty of? - Basically, of lying to a federal investigator. The law, which lawyers usually call 1001, for the section of the federal code that contains it, prohibits lying to any federal agent, even by a person who is not under oath and even by a person who has committed no other crime.

Harvey Silverglate, a criminal defense and civil liberties attorney based in Cambridge, Mass.
Elaine Lafferty, Editor-in-Chief of Ms. Magazine.

Bethany McLean, co-author of "Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron." She is also a staff writer for Fortune magazine.


here

Working Moms in Bind

You are reading http://viridianariverstone.blogspot.com/.

Working Moms in a Bind
Heather Boushey, Center for American Progress
March 8, 2004

This month, Congress must reauthorize the welfare reform law passed in 1996. As Congress considers welfare reform's track record, let's look at what really helped low-income families find jobs and care for their families.

The list is short: good jobs, child care, and health insurance. Without these, welfare reform is a sham.

A look at the facts shows that the punitive measures embodied in the welfare reform law were not the primary cause of its success.

Welfare reform was successful because the economy was good and because work supports -- child care and health insurance -- helped make work pay.

During the late 1990s when the states implemented welfare reform, jobs were plentiful and wages were rising, especially for low-wage workers. The tight labor market led to historically high levels of employment among Americans and more mothers were at work than at any previous time.

The strong economy meant that finding employment was easier than it would have been if welfare reform passed in the middle of a recession or in a period of falling inflation-adjusted wages.

Finding a job, however, is not enough to ensure that former welfare recipients are successful off welfare. What made the difference for many welfare mothers was the increased availability of child care and health care that were a part of welfare reform.

Since most former welfare recipients found jobs that did not offer health insurance and since child care is critical for working mothers, these work supports often made the difference between keeping a job and not.

Welfare reform recognized that a low-wage job might be insufficient to sustain a family through the notion of "making work pay." As a part of this, welfare reform gave states the flexibility and the funds to provide assistance to welfare mothers who began working.

Fortuitously, states had more money per welfare recipient in the late 1990s than they had previously because welfare rolls fell faster than funding levels.

Many states did use this extra cash to make work pay. Over the four years between 1997 and 2001, states gave an extra $7.7 billion to help pay for child care for low-income families. They gave an extra $24 billion to cover low-income children under the new Children's Health Insurance Program. They also gave more money for transportation and job training.

These extra funds helped mothers transition into the world of work. Access to child care was critical.

Finding child care in most American communities is tough for any parent. It is even harder for low-income families. On average, for low-income families -- those below 200 percent of poverty -- child care eats up about 14 percent of their family budget, compared to only about 7 percent for other families.

Money spent on child care directly supports the employment of mothers.
Mothers who use child care centers are more likely to stay employed than are mothers who turn to informal kinds of care, such as their grandmother, sister, or neighbor. Informal care can be wonderful -- when it works.

However, informal care is frequently not reliable, which means that it is inadequate for workers who can get fired if they must take off work to care for children.

Money spent on increased access to health care was also critical since most low-wage employers do not provide their employees with affordable health insurance. Among low-wage workers, only about one-third receive health insurance from their employer. The Children's Health Insurance Program, implemented in 1997, sought to increase coverage for children of the working poor, many of whom were former welfare recipients.

This is not to say that funding levels for child care or health care were entirely sufficient in the late 1990s. The Department of Health and Human Services reported that only about one in eight children eligible for federal child care subsidies actually received any assistance in 1999. Further, even though health insurance coverage increased for low-income children, millions remained uninsured.

The picture has worsened through the recession and tepid recovery.

As states sought to balance their budgets over the last two years, child care and health care subsidies to working parents were often first on the chopping block.

Thirty-two states have made cuts to their low-income child care programs and the Children's Health Insurance Program has been cut back in 22 states.

The Bush administration had the opportunity to prevent these drastic cuts. They could have offered real budget assistance to the states to limit these cuts.

This would have both helped their fiscal bottom line, as well as helped provide valuable assistance to families struggling to make it in a job-loss recovery. Instead, the administration gave tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans.

The issue before Congress now is what worked and what didn't in welfare reform. The administration believes that what worked were the sticks, not the carrots. Their proposed changes would limit child care spending while increasing the hours of work required for welfare recipients. The administration wants welfare moms to work 40 hours per week -- more hours than the typical mom works -- with no additional money to help pay for child care.

This blindness to understanding what working families need to make work work will only hurt families doing their best to find and keep jobs in today's economy. It is most telling that even though the economy has more than 2 million fewer jobs today than it had when Bush took office, the administration expects the lowest-paid workers to put in more time at work.

Dr. Heather Boushey is a research economist with the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C.

http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=18061